Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adrienne's avatar

Another fine piece. Thank you for pointing out the inevitable challenges in what constitutes true love.

Some day I’d like to engage with you (and others) on the subject of public service and electeds. Your views on DC/members of Congress are certainly, through one lens, understandable and justified. But I worked in state legislatures and on local, state, and federal policy for a quarter century and have a different perspective. Just as we need to love our neighbors even as we fundamentally disagree, we need to understand the forces driving public servants - elected and unelected - with better comprehension and understanding, for these usually flawed people, who are actually more « representative » fof their constituents than many want to contemplate, stand between us and far worse forms of governance. Even today there are good and principled people in these roles battling (often quietly) for the commonweal.

That’s for another day. For today, thank you for being both rigorous and thoughtful as we try to find a way out of the darkness in our benighted Republic.

Expand full comment
Seersucker's avatar

It is perfectly reasonable to think, about someone with whom we disagree on substantive issues, that they are making a mistake (presumably they might think the same of us). Sometimes this may mean that they have been conned. Obviously this is preferable to thinking of each other as motivatedly selfish or vicious. But there is a point at which thinking someone has been the victim of a con artist -- one who of course *we* could see right through -- is another form of disdain. And at present, there is a narrative according to which half the country disdains the other half. We do well do combat this narrative as much as possible. Love is hard enough as it is.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts